![]() ![]() When the issue came up before the five-judge bench, Chief Justice Y.V. Rao replied: "Any insistence of my personal appearance will be considered as further proof of the mala fide intentions with which the entire move has been initiated to bring forward a privilege move against me." But the committee maintained that the words " peddala galabha" conveyed a derogatory meaning.įinally, in February this year, the committee noted that Rao did commit a breach of privilege - by attributing motives to the chairman of the Legislative Council and members of the Privileges Committee, by attempting to ridicule the upper house and its members, by bringing down the image of the MLCs in the public eye and finally, by failure to turn up before the committee. Though peeved by what members of the Privileges Committee construed as "imputing motives" against them, the committee asked Rao to appear again, if necessary with his lawyer. The council is dominated by the Congress(I) and as the privilege motion shows, the member (Ranga Reddy) has reacted strongly to the editorial for the abolition of the upper house." ![]() It is a well-known fact that this paper supported Telugu Desam during the elections and editorially supported the state Government's policy decision to abolish the Legislative Council. #YESTERDAY EENADU NEWS PAPER IN TELUGU FREE#Argued Rao: "More than anything else, the basic requirement of any fair procedure is that the persons conducting the enquiry should be free from bias. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |